Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1182
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaza, Dr Syed Sami-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-14T06:35:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-14T06:35:36Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/1182-
dc.description.abstractIn 1985, when the Objectives Resolution was incorporated in Article 2-A of Pakistan‘s Constitution, the question of its justiciability re-emerged. Until then, the Resolution was part of the Preamble of the Constitution (1973), and hence non-justiciable. With its incorporation in Article 2-A — or in the substantive part — a number of cases surfaced in the superior courts challenging different laws and even constitutional provisions that appeared contradictory to the Resolution. Thus, its incorporation in the substantive part of the Constitution shook the coherence of its structured organisation. The change also brought back the question of Islam‘s place in the Constitution. This article engages constitutional theory debate on the structured organisation of Pakistan‘s Constitution and sheds light on how the Supreme Court responded to the incorporation of the Resolution in the value-neutral or justiciable part.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIPRI Journalen_US
dc.subjectReligionen_US
dc.subjectPakistanen_US
dc.subjectObjectives Resolutionen_US
dc.subjectJusticiabilityen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleContested Space of the Objectives Resolution in the Constitutional Order of Pakistanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art1ijs2017.htm145 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.