Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1187
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Asim-
dc.contributor.authorSyed, Mahroona Hussain-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-14T06:37:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-14T06:37:25Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/1187-
dc.description.abstractThe Islamic Military Alliance (IMA) of 34 countries, as proposed by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, is a force with the purpose to defeat the soaring menace of terrorism in Muslim states. Saudi Arabia considers Pakistan a frontline ally and included it as a member of this Alliance, albeit without consultation. Pakistan declined to join. The decision has been made from a foreign policy lens - given the country‟s relationship with Saudi Arabia, Iran (which is not included in the Alliance), other Shiite states and the concept of Muslim Ummah - instead of being considered from a strategic military perspective. Given the importance of this development, the article raises key questions while analysing the benefits, or otherwise, of military alliances from the framework of military expansionism, linking them with the mix of geostrategic complexities faced by Pakistan. It debates the plausibility and practicability of Pakistan joining the Middle Eastern venture.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIPRI Journalen_US
dc.subjectMiddle East and Pakistanen_US
dc.subjectMilitary Keynesianismen_US
dc.subjectMilitary Expendituresen_US
dc.subjectStrategyen_US
dc.subjectMilitary Allianceen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleStrategic Expediency or Sway: Analysing Pakistan’s Case for Joining the Islamic Military Allianceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
art4ijs2017.htm145 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.