Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1234
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Umar Farooq-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-14T06:47:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-14T06:47:25Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/1234-
dc.description.abstractNarrative construction plays an important role in the creation of national security policies. The rogue state narrative has been an important part of the conceptualisation and presentation of the security policies of the West. This became more pronounced after the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, which presented certain ‘rogue’ actors as a threat to the security of the international community. A relevant case study in this regard is the possession of nuclear weapons which has been deemed a risk in the hands of such proscribed ‘rogue states.’ This paper will analyse this assertion through the prism of Kant’s seminal work on Democratic Peace Theory which asserts that democracies seldom go to war due to their inherent peaceful tendencies of democracies. Furthermore, the study will look at criticisms of the theory from different theoretical paradigms of international relationsen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIPRI Journal (Journal on Current Affairs)en_US
dc.subjectDemocratic Peace Theoryen_US
dc.subjectKanten_US
dc.subjectNuclear Weaponsen_US
dc.subjectRogue Statesen_US
dc.subjectSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.titleDiscourse on Nuclear Weapons post-9/11 and Rogue States Narrativeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Article-3_Umar-F-Khan_JoCA_3_2_ED-SSA.htm171 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.