Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1319
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Jinming-
dc.contributor.authorWei, Wenbing-
dc.contributor.authorGuo, Rui-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-15T06:22:53Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-15T06:22:53Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/1319-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the clinical value of conventional ultrasound, ultrasound elastography and conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid micro-nodules. Methods: Eighty-six patients who were found with thyroid micro-nodules with the maximum diameter no more than 10 mm in the physical examination in our hospital from June 2015 to December 2017 were selected, and 102 nodules were included. All patients were confirmed with thyroid micro-nodules by puncture or surgical pathology and underwent conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography. Taking the surgical pathological results as a control, the value of conventional ultrasound, ultrasound elastography and conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid micro-nodules were compared. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the ROC curve was calculated. Results: One hundred and two thyroid nodules were detected by surgical pathology, including 75 benign nodules (73.53%) and 27 malignant nodules (26.47%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accordance rate of ultrasound elastography were significantly higher than those of conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid microcarcinoma, and the missed diagnosis rate of ultrasound elastography was significantly lower than that of conventional ultrasound; the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). However, the difference between the two methods was not statistically significant in terms of diagnostic specificity and misdiagnosis rate (P>0.05). The areas under the ROC curve in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules by conventional ultrasound and ultrasound elastography were 0.735 and 0.743 respectively. Conclusion: Conventional ultrasound can be used as a routine examination technique in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules, while ultrasound elastography can improve the sensitivity and diagnostic rate in the diagnosis of thyroid micro carcinoma. It can help to reduce the clinical missed diagnosis, which also can be be used as an effective supplement for conventional ultrasounden_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPak J Med Scien_US
dc.subjectMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonic elastographyen_US
dc.subjectConventional ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectThyroid micro-nodulesen_US
dc.titleUltrasonic elastography and conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of thyroid micro-nodulesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
299.htm129 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.