DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13213
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRasheed, Sana-
dc.contributor.authorShafiq, Muhammad-
dc.contributor.authorSanaullah, Oneeb-
dc.contributor.authorChiragh, Sadia-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-18T10:37:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-18T10:37:24Z-
dc.date.issued2018-12-15-
dc.identifier.citationRasheed, S., Shafiq, M., Sanaullah, O., & Chiragh, S. (2018). Comparison of vitamin d and lipid profile between rural and urban population. Pakistan Journal of Physiology, 14(4), 32-35.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1819-270X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13213-
dc.description.abstractThe two major sources of vitamin D are food and sunlight. Main factor that influence the extent of solar shortwave ultraviolet B radiation reaching earth is the air pollution. Uncontrolled urbanization leads to undue air pollution which may lead to increased prevalence of hypovitaminosis D among the urban population. Vitamin D deficiency is prevalent worldwide and studies have associated it with an altered lipid profile. This study was designed to compare the levels of serum vitamin D and lipid profile in adequately sun exposed population of rural and urban areas. Methods: This crosssectional comparative study was conducted on 80 male participants. Group 1 (n=40) comprised of rural residents and group 2 (n=40) of urban residents, all with adequate and equal exposure to sunlight. Serum vitamin D levels were measured using ELISA. Lipid profile was measured using enzymatic colorimetric methods. Results: Median age of participants was 51 (37–62) and 38 (25–46) years for rural and urban groups respectively. In rural group, sixteen participants (40%) had sufficient whereas 24 (60%) had insufficient vitamin D. No participant was found to be in deficient category. In urban group one participant (2.5%) was found in deficient and one (2.5%) in sufficient categories whereas 38 (95%) were found to be in insufficient category. The difference in frequency was found to be significant (p<0.001). Median and interquartile range of vitamin D in group 1 and II was 68 (56–54) and 49 (42–56) ηg/ml and the difference was significant (p<0.001). There was no difference between the two groups for triglycerides, total cholesterol and low-density lipoproteins, however, high density lipoproteins were significantly lower in group II as compared to group I (39.5±7.6 vs 47.6±9.0, p<0.001). Conclusion: Despite adequate and equal sun exposure, urban population had lower levels of vitamin D and high-density lipoproteins as compared to rural population.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAyub Medical College, Abbottabad.en_US
dc.subjectVitamin Den_US
dc.subjectlipid profileen_US
dc.subjectultraviolet raysen_US
dc.titleCOMPARISON OF VITAMIN D AND LIPID PROFILE BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN POPULATIONen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Issue No. 4

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sana.htm110 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.