DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13363
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLATIF, ANSAR-
dc.contributor.authorBHATTI, MUHAMMAD FARRUKH-
dc.contributor.authorQADIR, ANUM-
dc.contributor.authorSHAHWAR, ZOHA ALI-
dc.contributor.authorSHAHZAD, SHAROON-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-20T03:28:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-20T03:28:05Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.citationLatif, A., Farrukh Bhatti, M., Qadir, A., Shahwar, Z. A., & Shahzad, S. (2017). Effectiveness of anaesthesia for appendicectomy: comparison of spinal anaesthesia with other modalities being practiced in Emergency Department of Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital. Pak J Med Health Sci, 11(04), 1402-1403.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-7195-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13363-
dc.description.abstractAim: To determine the effectiveness, relative intra and post operative complications, postoperative recovery and cost effectiveness of spinal anaesthesia (SA) /regional anaesthesia (RA) compared with other modalities for appendicectomy. Study Design: Prospective, comparative observational study. Time and Place of study: Department of Anaesthesia and Surgery; Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital, Sialkot from 1st August 2016 till 31 July 2017. Methods: All patients undergoing appendectomy in specified time period with ASA (American society of Anesthesiologists) I and ASA II and having completed follow up of 2 months were included in study. Patients having perforated appendix undergoing laprotomy, with known history of Diabetes Mellitus, having ASA III, ASA IV , ASA V, having previous surgery, patients who left against medical advice and those who didn’t completed the follow up of 2 months were excluded from study. Results: Out of 350 patients that were included 328(93.75%f) patients had acute appendicitis while 22(6.28%) of patients doesn’t had acute appendicitis on peroperative diagnosis. Male to female ratio was 1:3.20 Group I – Spinal Anaesthesia included 112(32%) patients, Group II (A) general anaesthesia with intubation included 123(35.14%) patients, while Group II (B) general anaesthesia without intubation included 115(32.85%) patients. Maximum number of patients lies in 11-20 years age group i.e., 186(53.00%). Conclusion: Spinal anaesthesia is a safe, cost effective with minimal per and postoperative complications, efficient and effective modality for appendicectomy in emergency setting as compared to other modalities like general anaesthesia with or without endotracheal intubation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectGeneral anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectspinal Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectIntubationen_US
dc.subjectappendicectomyen_US
dc.titleEffectiveness of Anaesthesia for Appendicectomy: comparison of spinal anaesthesia with other modalities being practiced in Emergency Department of Allama Iqbal Memorial Teaching Hospital.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Oct-Dec,2017,Issue(4)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1402.htm120 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.