DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13758
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMEHMOOD, FARRUKH-
dc.contributor.authorIQBAL, JAVED-
dc.contributor.authorAWAN, AAMIR AYUB-
dc.contributor.authorAZIZ, BAKHT-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-26T10:06:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-26T10:06:17Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-
dc.identifier.citationMEHMOOD, F., IQBAL, J., & AWAN, A. A. Hypertrophic Rhinitis–Comparative Study of Submucosal Electric Cauterization versus Turbinate Reduction Surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-7195-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/13758-
dc.description.abstractWe planned this study to compare the results of two basic procedures done for reduction of size of inferior turbinates. This included 160 patients .The patients were equally divided into two groups namely those subjected to submucosal electrocauterisation (Diathermy) and turbinal reduction surgery group .Total number of patients were equally devided in two groups .Group 1 included 80 patients subjected to submucosal electrocauterization while the group 2 included 80 patients subjected to turbinate reduction surgery involving partial turbinectomy. The patients were monitored postoperatively at two weeks, two months and six months and their progress was recorded.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectsubmucosal electrocauterizationen_US
dc.subjectTurbinate reduction surgeryen_US
dc.titleHypertrophic Rhinitis – Comparative Study of Submucosal Electric Cauterization versus Turbinate Reduction Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Oct-Dec,2018,Issue(4)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1596.pdf242.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.