Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://localhost:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1492
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTao, Meng-Jun-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Ping-
dc.contributor.authorJin, Lai-Run-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Jun-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Hul-
dc.contributor.authorXu, Liang-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zhi-
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Hui-
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-18T10:53:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-18T10:53:14Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/1492-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Previous studies have shown that biologic agents out of the nine medicines might be beneficial for the treatment of SLE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most effective medication of six biologic agents in treatment of SLE using network meta-analysis (NMA). The performance of these processes is ranked according to the results of this analysis. Methods: Multiple databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was used to identify applicable articles and collect relevant data to analyzed by using STATA (13.0) software. The papers included in this study were divided into control group (placebo) and observation group (one of the six medicines). Results: A total of 21 eligible RCTs of biologic agents were identified, a total of 995 papers were included, and the results showed that the belimumab had the highest probability of being the most clinically efficacious intervention, with a surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve of 75.0, was significantly superior (P < 0.05) to placebo alone. The blisibimod was the worst, with a SUCRA value of 29.4. The other biologic agents (atacicept, blisibimod, epratuzumab, rituximab, tabalumab) were insignificantly superior (P > 0.05) to placebo alone. Conclusions: Belimumab had the highest probability of being the best treatment for SLE compared with the other biologic agents (atacicept, blisibimod, epratuzumab, rituximab, tabalumab). The other biologic agents indicated an insignificant difference in efficacy for the treatment of SLE compared with placebo.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPak J Med Scien_US
dc.subjectMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectAtacicepten_US
dc.subjectBelimumaben_US
dc.subjectBiologic agentsen_US
dc.subjectBlisibimoden_US
dc.subjectEpratuzumaben_US
dc.subjectNetwork meta-analysisen_US
dc.subjectRituximaben_US
dc.titleThe safety and efficacy of biologic agents in treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A network meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
327.htm129 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.