DSpace logo

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/17444
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGogi, Muhammad Dildar-
dc.contributor.authorMuhammad Ashfaq-
dc.contributor.authorArif, Muhammad Jalal-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Muhammad Aslam-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-06T06:48:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-06T06:48:39Z-
dc.date.issued2010-04-20-
dc.identifier.citationGogi, M. D., Ashfaq, M., Arif, M. J., & Khan, M. A. (2010). Bio-physical bases of antixenotic mechanism of resistance in bitter-gourd (Momordica charantia L., Cucurbitacae) against melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett)(Diptera: Tephritidae). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(2), 1251-1266.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0556-3321-
dc.identifier.urihttp://142.54.178.187:9060/xmlui/handle/123456789/17444-
dc.description.abstractPlants genotypes possess different phenotypic and/or biochemical properties, which resultantly induce in them different mechanisms of resistance. These mechanisms enable the plants to avoid, tolerate or recover from the effects of insect pest attacks. The results of the present studies revealed that there were significant variation in tested bitter-gourd genotypes for percentage fruit-infestation and larval-density per fruit. Col-II and Faisalabad-Long were ranked resistant genotypes and identified as resistance source for melon fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae. The larval density per fruit had a significant positive correlation (r = 0.992) with percentage fruit infestation. The fruit-length, fruit-diameter, number of longitudinal ribs/fruit and number of small ridges/cm2, which were significantly lowest in resistant and highest in susceptible genotypes, had a significant positive correlation with the percent fruit infestation and larval-density per fruit. However, fruit toughness, height of small ridges, height of longitudinal ribs and pericarp thickness, which were significantly highest in resistant and lowest in susceptible genotypes, had a significant negative correlation with the percent fruit infestation and larval-density per fruit. Step-wise multiple regression analysis indicated that the tested morphological traits explained 100% of the total variation in fruit infestation and larval-density per fruit. However, the fruit-length, fruit-diameter, fruit-toughness and number of longitudinal ribs showed 95.49% of the total variation in fruit fly infestation and 99.67% of the total variation in the larval-density per fruit. The maximum variation, in fruit infestation and larval-density per fruit, was explained by fruit toughness (63.4 and 49.2%, respectively) followed by fruit-diameter (23.22 and 22.34%, respectively) and number of longitudinal ribs (8.23 and 11.57%, respectively). These can be used as marker traits to induce resistance against melon fruit fly in bitter gourd; whereas, rest of the morphological fruit-traits explained less than 2% variation in the fruit infestation and less than 1% variation in the larval-density per fruit.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKarachi: Pakistan Botanical Society, University of Karachien_US
dc.titleBIO-PHYSICAL BASES OF ANTIXENOTIC MECHANISM OF RESISTANCE IN BITTER-GOURD (MOMORDICA CHARANTIA L., CUCURBITACAE) AGAINST MELON FRUIT FLY, BACTROCERA CUCURBITAE (COQUILLETT) (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Issue No. 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
archives2.php?vol=42&iss=2&yea=2010.htm133 BHTMLView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.